Overview

Philosophy and History

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

46.9

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

62 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

73.7 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 62%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

Philosophy and History

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 13.9 14.8 12.6 10.2 19.7 13.8 22.7 107.7 62.1% 0.7
Article, other 6.5 1.3 3.0 2.5 2.0 3.3 6.4 25.0 11.8% 0.1
Conference paper, peer review NA 1.8 0.4 NA 0.3 0.5 NA 3.0 60.4% 0.5
Conference paper, other 14.5 14.8 16.5 7.0 4.2 5.0 2.7 64.7 0.0% 0.0
Book NA 5.5 1.6 4.0 1.3 4.5 3.0 19.9 0.0% 0.1
Anthology (editor) 1.8 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.5 6.6 0.0% 0.2
Chapter in book 7.2 23.2 18.1 19.2 29.6 16.7 3.9 117.8 0.0% 0.2
Article, book review 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 2.0 7.0 6.0 34.0 58.8% 0.0
Report 1.0 1.8 1.7 2.6 0.8 0.6 0.8 9.3 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1.0 NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA 1.0 NA NA NA NA 1.0 2.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 22 24 20 21 28 29 37 181 66.3% 1
Article, other 10 3 4 4 4 5 10 40 25.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review NA 3 2 NA 1 1 NA 7 42.9% 0
Conference paper, other 17 16 19 8 5 6 5 76 0.0% 0
Book NA 6 3 4 2 5 3 23 0.0% 0
Anthology (editor) 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 13 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 9 29 24 24 35 23 8 152 0.0% 0
Article, book review 5 5 5 4 2 7 6 34 58.8% 0
Report 1 4 4 4 4 2 3 22 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA 1 NA NA NA NA 1 2 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

Philosophy and History

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 10.9 11.6 1.1 5.0 46.0%
2015 9.3 51.3 5.5 1.9 20.3%
2016 5.9 28.2 4.8 0.9 15.5%
2017 4.7 31.3 6.7 1.2 24.9%
2018 15.5 33.1 2.1 5.8 37.6%
Total 46.4 155.6 3.4 14.8 32.0%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 23.3 1.40 2.1 8.9%
2015-2017 18.3 1.93 3.2 17.3%
2016-2018 24.2 1.63 5.1 21.3%
2017-2019 25.8 1.12 3.3 12.7%
Total 49.1 1.25 5.4 10.9%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 45.3%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 35 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 50.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

Philosophy and History

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 23.3 1.16 5.6 23.9%
2015-2017 18.6 1.25 4.1 22.2%
2016-2018 24.5 1.26 5.9 24.1%
2017-2019 27.0 1.08 5.3 19.7%
2018-2020 37.2 1.13 6.8 18.3%
Total 64.9 1.17 13.4 20.7%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 35 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 50.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

Philosophy and History

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 37 6 16.2% 13 35.1%
2015-2017 34 7 20.6% 10 29.4%
2016-2018 41 5 12.2% 16 39.0%
2017-2019 53 7 13.2% 25 47.2%
2018-2020 66 6 9.1% 32 48.5%
Total 114 13 11.4% 50 43.9%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 34 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 53.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 22 17 4 1 0 7.3
Finland 8 8 0 0 0 4.6
Germany 15 10 4 1 0 3.6
Netherlands 18 9 8 1 0 2.8
United Kingdom 15 8 6 1 0 2.5
Norway 6 5 1 0 0 2.3
Estonia 3 2 1 0 0 2.1
Belgium 7 2 4 1 0 1.5
Russian Federation 4 4 0 0 0 1.0
Australia 7 2 4 1 0 0.9
Spain 4 2 1 1 0 0.9
Italy 4 2 1 1 0 0.8
Switzerland 5 1 3 1 0 0.6
South Africa 5 2 3 0 0 0.5
Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Canada 5 1 4 0 0 0.5
Denmark 3 2 1 0 0 0.4
China 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Kenya 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Japan 3 1 1 1 0 0.3
Peru 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Bangladesh 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Uganda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Viet Nam 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
India 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
Argentina 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Brazil 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
Mexico 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Kyrgyz Republic 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Malaysia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Nepal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Colombia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Hungary 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 13 13 0 0 0 5.4
University of Helsinki University Finland 7 7 0 0 0 4.5
Swedish National Defence College University College Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 3.0
Stockholm University University Sweden 9 7 2 0 0 2.6
University of Tartu University Estonia 3 2 1 0 0 2.1
Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) Institute United States 4 3 1 0 0 1.7
University of Stavanger University Norway 3 2 1 0 0 1.7
Wageningen University and Research Centre University Netherlands 11 5 6 0 0 1.6
Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study Institute Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 1.5
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 1.2
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point (UWSP) University United States 5 2 2 1 0 1.1
Catholic University of Leuven University Belgium 2 2 0 0 0 1.1
Uppsala University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
University of California, San Diego University United States 3 2 1 0 0 1.1
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) Institute Germany 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
Princeton University University United States 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
University of California, Berkeley University United States 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
Umeå University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
Lund University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona University Spain 3 2 1 0 0 0.9
National Research University Higher School of Economics University Russian Federation 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Australian National University University Australia 5 2 3 0 0 0.8
University of Cambridge University United Kingdom 4 2 2 0 0 0.8
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich University Germany 4 1 3 0 0 0.8
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 5 2 3 0 0 0.8
Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) Institute Sweden 4 3 1 0 0 0.8
European University at Saint Petersburg (EUSP) University Russian Federation 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Yale University University United States 3 2 0 1 0 0.7
Luleå University of Technology University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Erasmus University Rotterdam University Netherlands 6 1 5 0 0 0.6
Linköping University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Stanford University University United States 2 1 0 1 0 0.5
RAND Corporation Other United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Swedish Defence Research Agency Institute Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Swedish Environmental Research Institute Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Bari Aldo Moro University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Coimbra University Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of East London (UEL) University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Universität Regensburg University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Manchester University United Kingdom 3 2 1 0 0 0.5
Stellenbosch University University South Africa 3 1 2 0 0 0.4
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Harvard University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Leiden University University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Institute Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Hong Kong University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Zurich University Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
City, University of London University United Kingdom 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Imperial College London University United Kingdom 3 1 2 0 0 0.3
University of Copenhagen University Denmark 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Carnegie Mellon University University United States 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Blackeberg Gymnasium Other Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Tumba Gymnasium Other Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Agroscope Other Public Switzerland 3 0 3 0 0 0.3
Heidelberg University University Germany 3 0 3 0 0 0.3
University of Göttingen University Germany 3 0 3 0 0 0.3
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN) Institute Japan 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
JT International Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Karlstad University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Mälardalen University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Research Council (CNR) Other Public Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
NIFU Institute Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Pennsylvania State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swedish Tax Agency Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Center Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Södertörns University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Kenya (TU-K) University Kenya 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Catania University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Waterloo University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Örebro University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Condesan Other Peru 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Centre for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS) Other Public Bangladesh 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Osnabrück University University Germany 2 1 0 1 0 0.2
Florida State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Makerere University University Uganda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ochanomizu University University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Groningen University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Oklahoma University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Oslo University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Sheffield University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of South Carolina University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Tromsø University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Birmingham University United Kingdom 3 0 3 0 0 0.2
JKI NA Germany 2 0 2 0 0 0.2
Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie Institute Belgium 2 0 2 0 0 0.2
Gävleborg County Council Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Seton Hall University University College United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Bremen University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Leeds University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of North Carolina at Greensboro University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Aarhus University University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Can Tho University University Viet Nam 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Gerda Henkel Fdn NA Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Jan Kochanowski University University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Leicester University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Sussex University United Kingdom 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
CICERO Ctr Int Climate & Environm Res Oslo NA Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Finnish Meteorol Inst Institute Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Nordland Research Institute Institute Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
North-West University University South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Russian Academy of Sciences Other Public Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI) Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Vlaams Inst Biotechnol NA Belgium 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Antwerp University Belgium 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education Institute Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences University College Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Other Public Australia 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
Arizona State University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
James Cook University University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Autonomous University of Mexico University Mexico 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Swinburne University of Technology University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Univ Nacl San Martin University Argentina 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of California, Santa Barbara University United States 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
University of Oxford University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Utrecht University University Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Cardiff University University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Soc Hydrologists & Meteorologists SOHAM Nepal NA Nepal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Tribhuvan Univ University Nepal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Univ Cent Asia University Kyrgyz Republic 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of British Columbia University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University Putra Malaysia (UPM) University Malaysia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Other South Africa 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Institute Kenya 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
McGill University University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Other Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) Institute India 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University College London University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Boston College University College United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
European Soc Environm Hist NA Hungary 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
George Mason University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Georgetown University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Kruger Natl Pk NA South Africa 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Renmin Univ China University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
State Univ Goias University Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Stony Brook University, The State University of New York University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
UniEVANGELICA NA Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Alberta University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Los Andes (Uniandes) University Colombia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Montreal University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Wisconsin - Madison University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Western Washington University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Aberystwyth University University College United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Columbia University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Concordia University University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Lancaster University University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Monash University University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
New York University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Queen’s University Belfast University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of London University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of New South Wales University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Sydney University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Trieste University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Vienna University Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Wollongong University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Bangor Univ NA United Kingdom 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Bangor University University United Kingdom 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Biobot Analyt LLC Company United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
BORON BIOL INC NA United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA) Institute Spain 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Federal University of Bahia University Brazil 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Georgia Institute of Technology University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Georgia State University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Hampton Rd Sanitat Dist NA United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Hokkaido University University Japan 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Howard University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Indian Institutes of Technology University India 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Inst Agrochem & Food Technol IATA CSIC NA Spain 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Italian Natl Inst Hlth NA Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Jaume I University University Spain 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
KWR Water Res Inst NA Netherlands 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research Institute Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Massachusetts Institute of Technology University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Michigan State University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
North Carolina State University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Politecnico di Milano University Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Rice University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Southern Nevada Water Author NA United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) University Switzerland 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Toyama Prefectural University University Japan 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Tufts University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
UNC Chapel Hill Inst Marine Sci NA United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Arizona University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Barcelona University Spain 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Bath University United Kingdom 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Calabria University Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Michigan University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Notre Dame University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Pisa University Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Queensland University Australia 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Southern California University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Washington University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Yamanashi University Japan 1 0 0 1 0 0.0

Open Access

Philosophy and History

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 21 6 0 0 3 3 15 28.6%
2015 30 10 4 0 3 3 20 33.3%
2016 15 6 1 2 1 2 9 40.0%
2017 25 13 5 3 4 1 12 52.0%
2018 31 18 3 7 3 5 13 58.1%
2019 33 23 5 14 2 2 10 69.7%
2020 35 30 4 24 0 2 5 85.7%
Total 190 106 22 50 16 18 84 55.8%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

Philosophy and History

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 11.8 50.3 4.3 1.5 12.7%
2015 11.6 258.1 22.3 2.0 17.3%
2016 8.1 133.2 16.4 1.7 20.5%
2017 8.4 126.9 15.2 0.7 8.0%
2018 14.2 79.2 5.6 3.0 21.3%
2019 12.1 20.6 1.7 4.7 38.9%
2020 15.6 20.1 1.3 9.2 59.3%
Total 81.7 688.5 8.4 22.8 27.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 13 (full counted) publications with moderate Scopus coverage (at least 62.1%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 24.9 2.07 4.0 16.1%
2015-2017 23.4 2.84 5.4 23.0%
2016-2018 25.5 3.01 8.0 31.5%
2017-2019 29.3 1.65 5.3 18.2%
Total 54.2 1.84 9.3 17.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 48 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 69.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 27.3 1.08 6.1 22.5%
2015-2017 24.5 1.25 8.8 35.7%
2016-2018 27.5 1.25 13.9 50.6%
2017-2019 31.9 1.20 15.1 47.4%
2018-2020 36.8 1.21 15.8 42.8%
Total 71.3 1.18 26.3 36.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 48 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 69.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 45 2 4.4% 15 33.3%
2015-2017 45 2 4.4% 12 26.7%
2016-2018 47 2 4.3% 17 36.2%
2017-2019 59 1 1.7% 25 42.4%
2018-2020 71 1 1.4% 34 47.9%
Total 131 3 2.3% 54 41.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 45 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 67.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row